I've driven my 1.5 HS on the motorway and up Nathia galli for the first time and had a mixed experience with it. I was hoping to share my views with everyone and maybe get some feedback from others.
The car was fairly new with it only being driven around 600 km since taking delivery in January. I heard a lot about people being unhappy with the fuel consumption so I was eager to see what the deal was about. Motorway driving at 120 kmh gave an average of close to 11 km/l; something I felt was quite low. I'm used to driving a Sonata or Corolla that give something closer to 14 km/l so that wasn't quite as pleasant considering the high octane requirement.
The car stays planted and the firm suspension eats bumps and road imperfections very well. The sunlight was harsh but some shades or curtains would have fixed that. Other than that I wanted to test the adaptive cruise control and lane keep assists, which I had never used in any other cars. I personally thought that the adaptive cruise control keeps too much distance when behind another car which forces a sudden acceleration when the lane finally clears up. However, it worked reliably and is such a big upgrade to normal cruise control where I constantly have to speed up to avoid breaking or engage it over and over again. The lane keep impressed me the most though; even sharp turns the car can steer itself, albeit at high speeds that would get rather uncomfortable. I appreciated the features the most at night, when the car was able to keep itself in the lane, stop incase something was infront that my eyes may not have caught by oncoming cars blinding me with high beams, and giving me confidence to continue driving at 120 km/h. I wonder if other cars have systems that work equally well (or better)? The only car I could compare to a similar suspension set up would be the Peugeot 2008, which I love except the smaller size. Does anyone know how the adaptive cruise control and lane keep compare?
When climbing the mountains to Nathia galli from the Abbotabad side (which are supposedly steeper), the car did fine despite the higher altitude. I could feel the engine gasping for air but the throttle response still made for a comfortable ride. I encountered a little wheel spin during one hard overtake, but that was just some uncomfortable noise rather than a scare. Fuel consumption was high and I could see the range depleting very quickly (but it was all gained back on the decline). On the descent the paddle shifters in super sport mode made the drive quite easy and the engine breaking was helpful in saving the breaks. I'm used from my Sonata that if I hit the accelerator for a bit the car would stop the manual mode, however the HS happily stayed in the selected gear. My only concern was the seating position where I could just not get comfortable and after descending I really needed a break as my foot was aching. I do not know if that is just an issue I am facing or if others struggle with this too.
While the car is one of the more comfortable ones at high speeds, I do not think that I would continue using it for long routes due to the higher fuel consumption. If I plan to drive at night (which I usually avoid on motorways) I would probably only take the HS due to the driver assists. I'm curious to hear from others if they have any figures on the 2.0 HS and its fuel consumption, or if anyone compared the driving assists from other car manufacturers (Haval, Peugeout, Changan).